Lacrosse Message Board
|
| Subject: The bar is so low for plaintiffs' lawyers that any colorable claim is ok. |
| Posted by: wahoo_de on Fri May 4 2012 1:45:26 PM |
|
Message:
Not that I'm defending them -- I happen to think the "real" ethical line
is much higher than the bar set by the rules of professional responsibility -- but there's virtually no chance of someone being sanctioned for making a colorable claim on behalf of his or her client. In this case it's zealous advocacy run amok but there's a rationale to it. I agree w G-Len, though, they really need to level with their clients and additionally explain to them the reputational hit they may take in the UVA community for following a "scorched earth" litigation strategy; and I too hope that a no-nonsense judge will look at this case for what it is and throw it out, assuming they don't have evidence that we don't know about that shows complicity by the administration.. Nothing is going to bring their daughter back. The guilty party has been held accountable. It's time to move on. If you want to try to clean out the Huguelys, that's one thing. But going after the university that YL loved is really not a fitting tribute. And going after first-rate coaches who would never have condoned such behavior had they known about it is terrible. |
| Current Thread: |
SMH at this lawsuit- I understand the grieving and lashing out but somehow -- TpkeHoo Fri May 4 2012 9:42:57 AM |
The only 3 named were CL, DS, & MVA, correct? -- The Truth Fri May 4 2012 2:36:00 PM |
And the CommonWealth of Virginia -- PLB Fri May 4 2012 2:43:06 PM |
You ever have a daughter or son murdered? -- 2 ply Fri May 4 2012 2:00:47 PM |
Re: You ever have a daughter or son murdered? -- rocket Sat May 5 2012 6:22:22 PM |
This is about persecuting the innocent ** -- neworleanshoo Fri May 4 2012 4:40:15 PM |
I feared the persecution of the innocent would come -- G-Len Portier Fri May 4 2012 2:47:56 PM |
I understand the Louisa judge decides a lot of cases himself ** -- Hoogle.com Fri May 4 2012 7:12:28 PM |
Why don't all of you take this to the Soapbox? ** -- HOOfan_1 Fri May 4 2012 2:16:45 PM |
Great idea, or maybe nowhere since it's none of our business -- 2 ply Fri May 4 2012 2:24:24 PM |
Big difference here: there are many victims here besides the immediate family... -- BilldaHoo Sat May 5 2012 9:50:19 AM |
I disagree that its none of our business, playing devils advocate -- cavman11 Fri May 4 2012 4:04:05 PM |
Re: I disagree that its none of our business, playing devils advocate -- foos Sat May 5 2012 12:00:50 PM |
Love's family filed the suit alleging negligence on behalf of UVA and the -- FreshHoo Fri May 4 2012 2:42:52 PM |
I hope it doesnt divide the lax programs...... ** -- Zhoo Fri May 4 2012 2:49:51 PM |
That's certainly not taking it to the Soapbox...just scram already ** -- HOOfan_1 Fri May 4 2012 2:28:31 PM |
Who made you the leader of this outfit? -- 29-husky Sat May 5 2012 10:50:04 PM |
I get the feeling this suit is driven by the lawyers ... -- blah Fri May 4 2012 10:10:54 AM |
What is the name of the plaintiffs' lawyer? ** -- Cavaliere Fri May 4 2012 3:58:27 PM |
Irvin Cantor, a graduate of the University :( ** -- Hoogle.com Fri May 4 2012 10:32:08 PM |
Never mind, I found it. -- Cavaliere Fri May 4 2012 4:41:03 PM |
I find it interesting that Love still wanted to be around Hugley -- Zhoo Fri May 4 2012 5:09:21 PM |
That line is so tired. -- G-Len Portier Fri May 4 2012 11:23:26 AM |
True, but a lawyer is barred by the rules of the profession -- NaturalMysticHoo Fri May 4 2012 12:36:31 PM |
The bar is so low for plaintiffs' lawyers that any colorable claim is ok. -- wahoo_de Fri May 4 2012 1:45:26 PM |
And how do you know that its frivolous at this point? If it lacks a sufficient -- Godfather Fri May 4 2012 1:50:28 PM |
And that doesn't change the lack of duty or causation -- G-Len Portier Fri May 4 2012 2:46:53 PM |
Disagree with your assessment -- Godfather Fri May 4 2012 2:57:13 PM |
Off campus? No way. -- G-Len Portier Fri May 4 2012 5:55:48 PM |
Why not go after the woman's Lax coach too? -- NJHoo Fri May 4 2012 8:28:20 PM |
100% Agreement-Lawyers may be greedy but they need willing clients ** -- TpkeHoo Fri May 4 2012 11:51:00 AM |
No kidding. Filing in Louisa? C'mon; they're jury-shopping. So sorry -- WahooKnows Fri May 4 2012 11:09:25 AM |
Prob true but the family didnt have to bring it- lawyers are bad -- TpkeHoo Fri May 4 2012 11:07:39 AM |
The lawyers are "bad actors" if they have not disclosed -- G-Len Portier Fri May 4 2012 11:27:10 AM |
Respectfully disagree -- Cavaliere Fri May 4 2012 4:23:53 PM |
The lawyers are "bad actors ** -- G-Len Portier Fri May 4 2012 11:23:59 AM |
Re: I get the feeling this suit is driven by the lawyers ... -- CommonwealthKid Fri May 4 2012 10:42:02 AM |
And if it does go to trial, it can get ugly for the Love family as well ... -- blah Fri May 4 2012 10:13:40 AM |
You must log in before you can reply to a message.
Please login or
create an account
if you wish to reply.

