Sponsors Support

The Soapbox

  Register to Post  
Report Abuse  



Subject: That is an excellent point, and one not lost on me.
Posted by: KaHOOnah on Tue Feb 21 2012 9:50:49 AM
Message:

But I think if policy addresses one side of the coin without the other, the
policy is doomed to fail.

Prior to healthcare costs acceleration in teh 80s and 90s and aughts, I
think I read that Medicare was solvent, but I may be wrong about that.
As I understand it, the reason why these Medicare/Medicaid are
collapsing under their own weight is because of care/drugs' rising costs
in conjunction with people living longer. So you get hit with higher
costs/stay and more stays/lifetime. That's a toxic combination.

Otherwise, the bandaid fix that I referred to with SS could easily apply
to healthcare programs: lower the income / raise the age at which
people are eligible to collect benefits, decrease the benefits and/or
increase the contributions to it. But Medicare/Medicaid won't approach
solvency by only touching the eligibility portion of the problem. We have
to figure out a way of bending the cost-curve or all other efforts to save
these programs (which may, indeed, be impossible) will prove folly.

I think we're basically saying the same thing. We don't tend to view
government in wholly different ways and I always enjoy the
conversation.

Your post prompted me to think on end of life issues. My father is totally
decrepit. He's senile, suffers from severe type 2 diabetes, has gout in
nearly every joint the poor man has, and congestive heart failure. He's
recently been relegated to a bed 24/7 and has taken to hallucinating
visions that are, apparently, very scary. If he were my dog, we'd put
him to sleep out of absolute pity for the severe pain he endures and the
quality (lack thereof) of life he suffers. For crying out loud, the man was
literally a rocket scientist and now struggles to recall his wife's name.
Since he was NASA, his insurance is excellent and the costs incurred
by my mother and his children are less than what other families in a
similar position may incur, so I shouldn't complain. My brothers and I take
turns going home to change diapers and take care of the man to alleviate
the emotional and financial burden that my dear ma is too kind to
complain about. But the costs that insurance and Medicare incur to keep
the shell of my dad alive is astronomical. When I'm in that position, I hope
we have laws a little more similar to Holland than Virginia. I think I read
somewhere that ~80% of the medical costs per citizen are incurred in
teh last year of life. It seems callous to ask, but what is it for?

Current Thread:

   Lemme see if I got this right: Obama's last budget went down 97-0  --  Doug   Mon Feb 20 2012 10:43:23 AM
      It is a political strategy that will probably work. Why  --  cddc   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:31:16 PM
      This is actually how republics fall.   --  hawkb   Mon Feb 20 2012 1:52:18 PM
         Voters are selfish and spineless, consequently pols are too  --  Hood   Mon Feb 20 2012 5:32:36 PM
         That's a good post right there. Sums it up very well **  --  cvilleHOOrat   Mon Feb 20 2012 4:13:16 PM
         Good post. **  --  Doug   Mon Feb 20 2012 2:05:37 PM
         Good post, that's where I come out **  --  HiltonHeadHoo   Mon Feb 20 2012 1:57:33 PM
            I think people on this board don't realize how reasonable it is  --  hawkb   Mon Feb 20 2012 2:20:17 PM
               You probably think I am one of the most unreasonable but I would take Simpson/Bo  --  TomKazanski   Mon Feb 20 2012 2:33:00 PM
                  That sounds quite reasonable  --  Bacon   Mon Feb 20 2012 4:11:09 PM
      Obtuse, naive or just partisan junk?  --  Lazarus   Mon Feb 20 2012 12:58:58 PM
         Emboldened by Romney's collapse/Santorum's ascendency?  --  NaturalMysticHoo   Mon Feb 20 2012 5:00:39 PM
         I concur, mostly:  --  Doug   Mon Feb 20 2012 1:01:48 PM
      I seem to have gotten back to the board too late...  --  hoolstoptheheels   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:53:51 AM
         Below is the link to the spreadsheet showing taxes, spending, and deficits  --  Doug   Mon Feb 20 2012 12:38:30 PM
            Thanks Doug.  --  hoolstoptheheels   Mon Feb 20 2012 2:12:11 PM
               You're welcome. Below I have posted a link to the source  --  Doug   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:08:33 PM
                  Well, not without fixing the entitlement problem.  --  hoolstoptheheels   Mon Feb 20 2012 4:07:16 PM
                     What (in broad outlines) is your proposed fix?  --  southdenverhoo   Mon Feb 20 2012 5:27:23 PM
                        I'd like to see no entitlements.  --  hoolstoptheheels   Tue Feb 21 2012 8:27:58 AM
                        I think if Social Security can be fixed with a band-aid...  --  KaHOOnah   Tue Feb 21 2012 7:15:27 AM
                           Of course, the day of reckoning would be put off..  --  hoolstoptheheels   Tue Feb 21 2012 9:23:19 AM
                              That is an excellent point, and one not lost on me.   --  KaHOOnah   Tue Feb 21 2012 9:50:49 AM
                                 Well, first, I am very sorry for what you're going through.  --  hoolstoptheheels   Tue Feb 21 2012 10:07:07 AM
                                    I tend toward that libertarian view as well. I have the right to life, liberty  --  KaHOOnah   Tue Feb 21 2012 10:29:41 AM
                     I look up holding the line on spending as including holding the line  --  Doug   Mon Feb 20 2012 4:36:26 PM
               That's a hamhanded way of looking at the outlays and receipts, IMHO  --  KaHOOnah   Mon Feb 20 2012 2:28:32 PM
                  I understand all that.  --  hoolstoptheheels   Mon Feb 20 2012 4:26:14 PM
      Obama is a poor leader. However, the answer isn't to bring in some  --  Galileo24   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:44:09 AM
         There's that independent view! Just asking, don't  --  cddc   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:36:40 PM
      I'm not really sure what your point is? The House Republican's KNEW every...  --  I_Love_Lamp   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:12:16 AM
         Ah, yesssss, it is of no moment that Obama proposes one budget that every  --  Doug   Mon Feb 20 2012 12:21:49 PM
            You spelled Democratic wrong. {106} **  --  Metcalf   Tue Feb 21 2012 5:11:56 AM
               "Democratic" is an inapt descriptor of the Democrat party and of its members. **  --  Doug   Tue Feb 21 2012 9:49:27 AM
         For one, that the label "do nothing" republicans is flatly incorrect.  --  Hoo05Dave   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:40:06 AM
            I don't see the difference between a 'do nothing' party and a party that passes  --  I_Love_Lamp   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:53:04 AM
               Well have you ever considered that some of these regulations overreached and  --  HooBauer   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:28:22 PM
               Again, for the third opportunity, you duck the point about the budget...  --  Hoo05Dave   Mon Feb 20 2012 12:06:16 PM
                  Agree to disagree. I see promoting bills that have no chance of getting approve  --  I_Love_Lamp   Mon Feb 20 2012 12:52:27 PM
                     All politicians do this. Your kidding yourself if you  --  cddc   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:39:32 PM
                     Ever heard of a Conference Committee? **  --  JMHoo   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:19:06 PM
                     I'm not saying it's a good thing...  --  Hoo05Dave   Mon Feb 20 2012 1:05:39 PM
                  Agree Dave. Every POTUS budget in my lifetimme has been called "DOA" before it   --  WaxHoo   Mon Feb 20 2012 12:44:36 PM
         Surely you can see there can be a balance between having rives on fire  --  Hoodafan   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:27:02 AM
            Damn glad I read all of this. I know we hate UNC but "rives" is a good guy  --  HooBauer   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:31:41 PM
            The problem is finding that balance. I don't disagree that there are  --  Galileo24   Mon Feb 20 2012 1:42:27 PM
               A little kepone (sp) never hurt anyone! **  --  cddc   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:41:17 PM
            I could care less about 'spotted owls.' What should not be protected at all  --  I_Love_Lamp   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:44:59 AM
               Re: EPA brought a lot of this on themselves with over regulation. **  --  PhillyHoo   Mon Feb 20 2012 2:42:12 PM
               LMAO you are holded the EPA up as the standard bearer of efficinet govt  --  TomKazanski   Mon Feb 20 2012 12:55:03 PM
                  Your stupidity still amazes me each and every day. **  --  I_Love_Lamp   Mon Feb 20 2012 3:30:21 PM
                     Lets see you put faith in one of the most corrupt govt agencies in existence and  --  TomKazanski   Mon Feb 20 2012 4:30:26 PM
            Make that rivers, not one of my favorite posters even if he is a Heel fan. **  --  Hoodafan   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:27:57 AM
         I'd settle for a Fiscal Conservative who's actually fiscally conservative.   --  KaHOOnah   Mon Feb 20 2012 11:18:52 AM

You must log in before you can reply to a message.
Please login or create an account if you wish to reply.